Top Ten Theologians of All Time

Here's my opinion of the top 10 most influential post-apostolic theologians of all time:

  1. Athanasius – Defended the church from the most serious heresy it faced: Arianism.
  2. Martin Luther – Champion of justification by faith and sola scriptura.
  3. Augustine – Defended the church from the Manichean and Pelagian heresies, even if he took predestination too far.
  4. Basil – Defender of the doctrine of the Trinity.
  5. Thomas Aquinas – Reconciled faith and reason.
  6. John Calvin – His historical/grammatical approach to scripture paved the way for most of us, even if he took predestination way too far.
  7. James Arminius – Athanasius understood God, Augustine understood man, and Arminius understood the relationship between God and man.
  8. Anselm – His satisfaction of justice theory of the atonement is almost universally held among evangelicals.
  9. Jonathan Edwards – One of the founding revivalists of the first great awakenings and influential American philosopher.
  10. Jerome – His translation of the scripture into Latin both provided and preserved the scriptures.

Comments

Kevin Davis said…
I'm always interested when people do these lists. I think you pretty much got the list right. I probably would not have included Jerome, but since the list is "most influential," his placement is appropriate. I would have put Karl Barth at number 10, but it is perhaps still too early to tell how influential he will be in, say, 100 or 200 years. But I'm pretty confident that we will be reckoning with Barth, like we do with Augustine and Thomas, until Our Lord's return.
October 1, 2008 at 12:53 AM
Godismyjudge said…
Hi Kevin,

Thanks for commenting. Of course, I meant no slight to Barth (or anyone else for that matter). Jerome was a tough pick; I wavered between him and Erasmus. But I did want one linguist represented. Seems to me that during times of rapid change, there's usually the combination of a leader and a linguist. Zerubbabel /Ezra, Augustine/Jerome, and Luther/Erasmus.

God be with you,
Dan
October 1, 2008 at 8:14 PM
Silouan said…
Athanasius is maybe less influential than he might seem. Thanks to him, the Trinity is a given today; but if you read his On the Incarnation, you'll notice that Athanasius' actual argument -- which convinced the Council the divine incarnation is a necessary part of the Gospel -- hasn't remained a significant part of Western theology.

(Then again his "Life of St. Antony" was a huge part of the development of Gaulish and Irish monasticism, so he did have some significant influence after all...)
July 17, 2009 at 11:34 PM
Godismyjudge said…
Hi Silouan,

Interesting. Thanks for the link. I will check it out, but clearly Athanasius was influential if, thanks to him, the Trinity is a given today.

God be with you,
Dan
July 20, 2009 at 7:26 PM
D. R. L. said…
An interesting list, and fascinating you included no Baptist.
December 15, 2013 at 10:55 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Responsibility - Evaluation of Arminian Grounds for LFW

Outline of Edwards Arguments in part V.I Arminians say if something causally predetermines our choices, we are not responsible. But responsibility is not the cause of choices, it’s in the nature of choices If responsibility is in the cause of choices, we search through an infinite regression of causes, and nothing is ever responsible. My Response Point 1 is close, but not quite accurate. While our actions can be predetermined, our choices cannot be. Choice cannot be predetermined, else it’s not choice. Predeterminism leave us with only one possible action, but choice requires alternatives (i.e. more than one). A “predetermined choice” is self-contradictory, implying we can choose something we can’t choose. So we think Calvinists are inconsistent for saying we can choose. Also, Arminians agree that we are responsible for our choices. Even though we deny we are responsible for things we are causally predetermined to do, we are not saying responsibility lies in the cause of choices,
Read more

John Owen - Death of Death in the Death of Christ

For those who may have suffered through my review of John Owen's classic work the Death of Death in the Death of Christ, I have wonderful news. You get to do it all over again!!! I compiled it into 5 articles available here . I also added a link on the left side of my blog. I also now have a left side of my blog. :-) God be with you, Dan
Read more

The Equivocation of Regeneration

In the order of salvation, which comes first, faith or regeneration? Before we can answer that, don't we first need to understand what regeneration is? In this post I plan on contrasting Hodge's view with Arminius'. Hopefully, in the process we can clarify the issue of monergism vs. synergism. Hodge’s Order of Salvation Common Grace – a “moral suasion” that brings good works, but is insufficient to enable justifying faith Regeneration – God’s supernatural and immediate change of a person’s nature Vocation – same Gospel as the one in common grace, but it’s effectual on the changed man. Conversion – faith and repentance “first conscious exercise of the renewed soul” Justification Two Definitions of Regeneration Hodges provides two alternative definitions of regeneration. Sometimes regeneration means just the imparting of life, other times it means the whole process including the things coming before and after the imparting of life. 1 Hodge says these two difference sense
Read more