Paul seems to missunderstand my view on scripture. He states: Crucial to Dan’s argument is the claim that “common man” are all, each and every, libertarians. If Dan claims that some “common men” are not indeterminist, but determinist, then he defeats one of his premises, or makes the Bible speak in contradictions. To spell this point out, recall that Dan says, “The Bible is written by and to the common man, it means what they mean, since they mean certain words libertarianly, then the Bible so means those words.” Yet if we allow some (even one?) of the “common men” to whom the Bible was written to be determinists, then it must mean what they mean by the words that are the topic of our discussion. However, since there are indeterminist “common men”, then the Bible must also mean what they mean by the words we are discussing! Therefore, Dan must assume that each and every “common man” is a libertarian, which I find highly implausible. ( link ) It was not said what was said I said. The b...
Comments
We can hope it isn't this bad (although things do look dark). God knows and we can pray either way.
God be with you and give you the words and strength when you visit.
Dan
I heard from Billy. If you would like to know a bit more, please email me. My address is available via my profile.
God be with you,
Dan
God be with you,
Dan
I did go by the county jail, but Billy had already bonded out, so I wasn't able to see him.
I don't know that there is more to say privately at this time, but if there is, or if I might be of any help from a local perspective, please email me at sam@carychristian.org