I recently was reading a book that accused James Arminius of a Trinitarian heresy: denying Christ’s aseity (self existence). This relates to the “auto-theos” controversy in which Arminius denied a specific sense in which Christ is God “from Himself”. ( Works of James Arminius. Apology Article 21 ) That is to say, Arminius defended the doctrine in the Nicene creed: ” And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds , Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father ”. In short, Arminius defended the Father’s eternal generation of the Son. In this post, I will briefly provide the biblical basis for eternal generation and then defend it from a specific charge: that affirming the eternal generation of the Son implicitly denies the aseity of the Son. 1 John 5:18 says “ We know that everyone who has been born of God do...