Romans 9 Debate

Turretinfan has agreed to a debate on the correct interpretation of Romans 9. We have yet to work out the timing, rules and resolution but will be doing so shortly, DV.

In the mean time I have been going through Romans 9 and translating it. At the time I wrote this article:

http://www.geocities.com/freewilltheology/romans9.html

I hadn't yet studied Greek. So far, my reviewing the chapter in Greek only provides minor modifications to my understanding of the chapter. When I have finished I plan on posting a few translation notes.

Comments

Anonymous said…
There are differences of opinion even within Arminianism. My position on Romans 9 is as follows: God sovereignly chose, first, a geneological lineage of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob (and bypassing others) onward to the nation of Israel, for extraordinary blessing and historical destiny to forward God's plan of salvation to the world and to produce the "seed."

This ties in with the promise in Genesis of "All nations on earth will be blessed through you and your seed." (Gen. 26:4b-NKJ) Who is the seed? It is Christ and those who are in him. (Gal. 3: 16, 29)
The chosen destiny of Israel was to produce the Messiah and the Israel of faith.

John D. Wagner
November 3, 2007 at 12:27 AM
Godismyjudge said…
John,

Thanks for stopping by. Yep there are differences even among Arminians. I think most agree that Romans 9 teaches the national election of Israel. But that national election is somehow tied to salvation. Exactly how salvation is tied in with national election is where there is a bit of disagreement.

For me the key is explaining why the word of God did not fail and that not all Israel is of Israel. That is to say God's original plan succeeded and within national Israel there is a subset of spiritual Israel. The passage is probably more focused on rejection than acceptance. Its explaining why national Israel is rejected. So I am not sure that an explanation that states God choose to spiritually bless the nation of Israel is complete, because it doesn‘t account for the Jews rejection. Rather, I think the passage is teaching that God's national election of Israel illustrates His choice to save by grace through faith in Christ, and His rejection of Ishmael and Esau illustrates His rejection of national lineage and the works of the law. God's original promise to Abraham was national the election of Israel, but spiritually the Gospel. The spiritual aspect accounts for why the Jews are rejected. They are seeking slavation through works and not through faith. God’s choice stipulated how He would save, not who He would save.

God be with you,
Dan
November 3, 2007 at 9:15 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Responsibility - Evaluation of Arminian Grounds for LFW

Outline of Edwards Arguments in part V.I Arminians say if something causally predetermines our choices, we are not responsible. But responsibility is not the cause of choices, it’s in the nature of choices If responsibility is in the cause of choices, we search through an infinite regression of causes, and nothing is ever responsible. My Response Point 1 is close, but not quite accurate. While our actions can be predetermined, our choices cannot be. Choice cannot be predetermined, else it’s not choice. Predeterminism leave us with only one possible action, but choice requires alternatives (i.e. more than one). A “predetermined choice” is self-contradictory, implying we can choose something we can’t choose. So we think Calvinists are inconsistent for saying we can choose. Also, Arminians agree that we are responsible for our choices. Even though we deny we are responsible for things we are causally predetermined to do, we are not saying responsibility lies in the cause of choices,
Read more

John Owen - Death of Death in the Death of Christ

For those who may have suffered through my review of John Owen's classic work the Death of Death in the Death of Christ, I have wonderful news. You get to do it all over again!!! I compiled it into 5 articles available here . I also added a link on the left side of my blog. I also now have a left side of my blog. :-) God be with you, Dan
Read more

The Equivocation of Regeneration

In the order of salvation, which comes first, faith or regeneration? Before we can answer that, don't we first need to understand what regeneration is? In this post I plan on contrasting Hodge's view with Arminius'. Hopefully, in the process we can clarify the issue of monergism vs. synergism. Hodge’s Order of Salvation Common Grace – a “moral suasion” that brings good works, but is insufficient to enable justifying faith Regeneration – God’s supernatural and immediate change of a person’s nature Vocation – same Gospel as the one in common grace, but it’s effectual on the changed man. Conversion – faith and repentance “first conscious exercise of the renewed soul” Justification Two Definitions of Regeneration Hodges provides two alternative definitions of regeneration. Sometimes regeneration means just the imparting of life, other times it means the whole process including the things coming before and after the imparting of life. 1 Hodge says these two difference sense
Read more