Accord­ing to the Good Pleasure of His Will

Calvinist find a hint of unconditionally in the phrase "accord­ing to the good pleasure of His will". If God is calling the shots, with respect to us it must be random. Arminians need not understand the phrase along those lines. This just means God's plans are wise and good and in accordance with His Holiness, Justice and Goodness.

Comments

The Seeking Disciple said…
I agree. The context focuses on Christ and our being chosen in Him. Arminius' view of election was the Christ was the center of election and everything revolves around Him being the chosen one.
September 19, 2010 at 8:26 AM
Shfengoli said…
Since the Calvinists are wrong, why must their position be misrepresented by using the word "random"?
September 19, 2010 at 9:25 PM
Godismyjudge said…
Dear Shfengoli,

Context, context context. Sure, Calvinists say God has a reason, but they also say we are not that reason. Thus, I didn't just say random but rather I said "with respect to us it must be random".

Here's a quote from Dort to back it up:

"This same election took place, not on the basis of foreseen faith, of the obedience of faith, of holiness, or of any other good quality and disposition"

http://www.reformed.org/documents/index.html?mainframe=http://www.reformed.org/documents/canons_of_dordt.html

God be with you,
Dan
September 20, 2010 at 11:20 AM
Shfengoli said…
But doesn't that ignore their assertion that God uses intermediate causes in nearly ever working-out of His will? Calvinists don't seem to have a problem saying that people must make choices; that they make their choices for reasons; and that, ultimately, God's will is fulfilled through these means (as in the case of Joseph and his brethren).
September 21, 2010 at 11:29 AM
Godismyjudge said…
I don't think so, because Calvinists don't see secondary causes or our choices as the reason God elects this person rather than that person.

Ordinarily we choose things based on some quality about what we are choosing. So when Calvinism talks about God's election, they are using election (or choice) in a special sense; because our actions and qualities are not the reason God chooses this person rather than that person. They do say God has a reason, but that reason is not us.

This is one of the reasons why I see understanding the election passages as conditional rather than unconditional. Normally choices are conditional. Normally, we choose things based on some quality in what we are choosing. Calvinists understand election in a strained and unnatural way.

God be with you,
Dan
September 21, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Responsibility - Evaluation of Arminian Grounds for LFW

Outline of Edwards Arguments in part V.I Arminians say if something causally predetermines our choices, we are not responsible. But responsibility is not the cause of choices, it’s in the nature of choices If responsibility is in the cause of choices, we search through an infinite regression of causes, and nothing is ever responsible. My Response Point 1 is close, but not quite accurate. While our actions can be predetermined, our choices cannot be. Choice cannot be predetermined, else it’s not choice. Predeterminism leave us with only one possible action, but choice requires alternatives (i.e. more than one). A “predetermined choice” is self-contradictory, implying we can choose something we can’t choose. So we think Calvinists are inconsistent for saying we can choose. Also, Arminians agree that we are responsible for our choices. Even though we deny we are responsible for things we are causally predetermined to do, we are not saying responsibility lies in the cause of choices,...
Read more

Acts 4:28 - Mental Resolution or Causal Predetermination

The Scholastics used to ask “does predestination place anything in the predestined?” A relevant question indeed concerning Acts 4:28. Consider the translation change from the 1984 NIV to the 2012 ISV: “They did what your power and will had decided beforehand should happen.” 1984 New International Version “to carry out everything that your hand and will had predetermined to take place” 2012 International Standard Version The NIV speaks of God’s choice – a mental resolution on His part – the ISV speaks of God’s actions impacting and determining the events. In the NIV, God’s mind is set; in the ISV the events are set. The Greek term proorizo is flexible in either direction – both translations are permissible. Yet the ISV clarifies the ambiguous term in favor of Calvinism. The argument for determinism based on the ISV is simple – God predetermined sinful actions for which man is morally responsible, therefore compatible determinism is true. But this argument is not quite so ...
Read more

Dan's Opening: The Bible Teach Libertarian Free Will Debate (Part 2 of 12)

Image
Over 3,000 years ago after giving Israel the law, God  challenged  Israel by saying:  14  But the word is very near you. It is in your mouth and in your heart,  so that you can do it .   15  “See, I have set before you today life and good, death and evil.  16  If you obey the commandments of the LORD your God that I command you today, by loving the LORD your God, by walking in his ways, and by keeping his commandments and his statutes and his rules, then you shall live and multiply, and the LORD your God will bless you in the land that you are entering to take possession of it.  17  But if your heart turns away, and you will not hear, but are drawn away to worship other gods and serve them,  18  I declare to you today, that you shall surely perish. You shall not live long in the land that you are going over the Jordan to enter and possess.  19  I call heaven and earth to witness aga...
Read more