Does 1 John 2:2 Teach Unlimited Atonement?


Points of Disconcurrance

1 John 2:2 He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.  

 •        What does propitiation mean?

•        Dan/Arminian

•        Propitiation relates most directly to Christ’s death on which is the basis of the application of blood to those who repent and believe.

•        Propitiation is that which can propitiate.

•        Turretinfan/Calvinist

•        Propitiation relates most directly to the application of Christ’s blood to the believer, which actually cleanses from sin.

•        Propitiation is that which actually has propitiated.

•        Who do the pronouns refer to? - “our” (and “you” and “we” in the inbound context).

•        Dan/Arminian

•        The “our” is John and his audience, which is basically believers or the church.

•        Turretinfan/Calvinist

•        The “our” is John and other apostles or church leaders with John at the time of writing, as it is in the prolog (1 John 1:1-5)

•        Can forgiveness be offered to the reprobate if Christ did not die for them?

•        Dan/Arminian

•        Forgiveness is only available based on Christ’s blood, and as far as the reprobate are concerned, it’s as if Christ didn’t die at all, so no.

•        Turretinfan/Calvinist

•        We have no way of know who the reprobate are or filtering the gospel only to the elect.

•        What in the world does world mean?

•        Dan/Arminian

•        World is contrasted with believers and means everyone who isn’t a believer, like in 1 John 5:19.

•        The concept “world” as related to people is developed from and relates back to specific individuals.

•        Turretinfan/Calvinist

•        World doesn’t always everyone - it just means a broad group.  It means something like believers here and other places, or Jews/Gentiles or present vs. future believers.

 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Responsibility - Evaluation of Arminian Grounds for LFW

Outline of Edwards Arguments in part V.I Arminians say if something causally predetermines our choices, we are not responsible. But responsibility is not the cause of choices, it’s in the nature of choices If responsibility is in the cause of choices, we search through an infinite regression of causes, and nothing is ever responsible. My Response Point 1 is close, but not quite accurate. While our actions can be predetermined, our choices cannot be. Choice cannot be predetermined, else it’s not choice. Predeterminism leave us with only one possible action, but choice requires alternatives (i.e. more than one). A “predetermined choice” is self-contradictory, implying we can choose something we can’t choose. So we think Calvinists are inconsistent for saying we can choose. Also, Arminians agree that we are responsible for our choices. Even though we deny we are responsible for things we are causally predetermined to do, we are not saying responsibility lies in the cause of choices,...
Read more

The Difference Maker

Hodges' Argument Hodge argues that unless grace is resistible, the ultimate reason some believe and not others is found in us and not in God. Hodge says this would make believers better, more impressible or less obstinate than other. 1 Problem Non-Unique Personally, I find this one of the most powerful Calvinistic arguments. The idea that I can take credit for my salvation is intolerable, as is the idea that I am better than someone else. But the Calvinist solution is no solution, and it creates more problems than it resolves. Let’s take the argument that believers can take credit for their faith. But Calvinists also say people believe. Therefore Calvinism entails that people can take credit for their faith. It does not good for Calvinists to object that in Calvinism, grace is the sufficient cause of faith and in Arminianism, it is not. That doesn’t impact responsibility. In Calvinism, people are responsible for their actions, even though they are predetermined by sufficient caus...
Read more

The Main Reason I am a Molinist

The scriptures teach God's providence and man's choice. Molinism reconciles the two cleanly. In explaining scripture, Calvinism has to 'explain away' man's freedom and Simple Foreknowledge has to explain away God's providence. Consider Acts 4:28 and Matthew 23:37 : Acts 4:27-28 - “For truly against Your holy Servant Jesus, whom You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the people of Israel, were gathered together to do whatever Your hand and Your purpose determined before to be done. Calvinist - God planned the events leading up to Christ's crucifixion Molinist - God planned the events leading up to Christ's crucifixion Simple Foreknowledge - Only the crucifixion was planned, not the events leading up to it. Mt 23:37 - O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not wil...
Read more