Index to Daniel Whitby on Grace

Daniel Whitby's Discourses on the 5 Points was, during its day, the definitive Arminian work against Calvinism. Whitby had a commanding knowledge of the scriptures, and his book is a detailed and unrelenting examination of Calvinism. It drew responses from famous Calvinists Jonathan Edwards, Inquiry into the Will and John Gill, the Cause of God and Truth.
Below is an index to Whitby's discourse on Grace. Archaic spellings and words have been updated, sentences broken down into shorter sentences and links to scripture references inserted.
.
.
Chapter 2: Arguments against Irresistible Grace
Chapter 3: Refuting Arguments for Irresistible Grace

Comments

Unknown said…
is this a book that I can buy currently? I'm sure they reprint some older works, I don't know if they have for this one. I'd read it off your blog but it seems like a valuable reference tool to have; plus my eyes hurt from reading too much text on screen. Thanks.
November 28, 2008 at 1:45 PM
Godismyjudge said…
Hi Jcoolio,

Thanks for reading and commenting. Unfortunately it's been out of print for quite some time and AFAIK it hasn't been republished. It's the type of book that shows up on ebay from time to time. The full softcopy is available on google books, but it's unprintable and even harder to read. Sorry I couldn't be of more help.

God be with you,
Dan
November 28, 2008 at 8:47 PM
The Seeking Disciple said…
Thanks for posting this. I had never heard of the book nor the man. His knowledge is incredible and how we need more godly Arminians of his stature.
November 30, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Godismyjudge said…
Thanks for the encouragement Roy. I didn't really know about him either till I read Edwards. Edwards was ***refuting*** Whitby, but I kept saying to myself, Whitby gets it and Edwards doesn't.

God be with you,
Dan
November 30, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Responsibility - Evaluation of Arminian Grounds for LFW

Outline of Edwards Arguments in part V.I Arminians say if something causally predetermines our choices, we are not responsible. But responsibility is not the cause of choices, it’s in the nature of choices If responsibility is in the cause of choices, we search through an infinite regression of causes, and nothing is ever responsible. My Response Point 1 is close, but not quite accurate. While our actions can be predetermined, our choices cannot be. Choice cannot be predetermined, else it’s not choice. Predeterminism leave us with only one possible action, but choice requires alternatives (i.e. more than one). A “predetermined choice” is self-contradictory, implying we can choose something we can’t choose. So we think Calvinists are inconsistent for saying we can choose. Also, Arminians agree that we are responsible for our choices. Even though we deny we are responsible for things we are causally predetermined to do, we are not saying responsibility lies in the cause of choices,
Read more

John Owen - Death of Death in the Death of Christ

For those who may have suffered through my review of John Owen's classic work the Death of Death in the Death of Christ, I have wonderful news. You get to do it all over again!!! I compiled it into 5 articles available here . I also added a link on the left side of my blog. I also now have a left side of my blog. :-) God be with you, Dan
Read more

Hodge on Ephesians 1:17-19

Hodge argues for effectual calling based on Ephesians 1:17-19. He claims that the passage teaches the regeneration is monergistic , so it proves God's call is effectual. Here's the passage: Ephesians 1:17-19 17 that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give to you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him, 18 the eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that you may know what is the hope of His calling, what are the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints, 19 and what is the exceeding greatness of His power toward us who believe, according to the working of His mighty power. Hodge has several problems. First, the passage teaches sanctification, not regeneration. It's dealing with living the Christian life and growing in grace, not conversion. Second, even if the passage were teaching that regeneration is monergistic , this wouldn't prove that God's call is effectual. I agree regeneration, strictly defi
Read more